Best Solana Perpetual DEXs in 2027: Ranked by Liquidity, Fees and Execution
Compare the best Solana perpetual DEXs by liquidity, fees, trading volume, execution model, order types, collateral, APIs, mobile support, incentives and security.
Research Verified: 26 July 2026
Editorial Note: Perpetual trading volumes, open interest, liquidity and fees can change quickly. The figures below are a snapshot captured during research and should be rechecked in the live interface before trading.
Summary
The best Solana perpetual DEX depends on whether the trader prioritises order-book execution, pool liquidity, low fees, real-world markets, mobile access or fully on-chain settlement.
Our overall ranking is:
- Pacifica for professional execution, advanced order types and API trading
- GMTrade for current trading volume, low fees and real-world asset markets
- Jupiter Perps for pool liquidity, mobile support and beginner accessibility
- Phoenix Perps for fully on-chain order-book execution and transparent fees
- Flash Trade for broad market coverage, pool-based liquidity and token incentives
- Velocity for low taker fees, maker rebates and advanced trading infrastructure
- Adrena for community ownership, zero opening fees and direct token-holder revenue
At the time of research, GMTrade had the highest 30-day perpetual volume among the Solana-native platforms measured here, while Jupiter had by far the largest liquidity pool. Pacifica combined substantial volume and open interest with a professional central-limit-order-book experience. Phoenix offered the clearest fully on-chain order-book architecture but remained smaller by current volume.
Best overall for professional traders: Pacifica
Best current volume and RWA platform: GMTrade
Best for beginners and mobile: Jupiter Perps
Best fully on-chain order book: Phoenix Perps
Best for varied collateral and markets: Flash Trade
Best maker economics and automation: Velocity
Best community-owned alternative: Adrena
Best Solana Perpetual DEXs at a Glance
Rank | Platform | Best For | Base Trading Cost | Execution Model | DN Score |
1 | Pacifica | Professional and API traders | 0.015% maker, 0.040% taker | Hybrid central limit order book | 91/100 |
2 | High-volume RWA and crypto trading | From 0.004% to 0.012% per open or close | Oracle-priced liquidity pools | 89/100 | |
3 | Jupiter Perps | Beginners, mobile users and deep pool liquidity | 0.06% per open or close plus impact and borrow costs | Oracle-priced JLP pool | 85/100 |
4 | Phoenix Perps | Fully on-chain execution | 0.005% maker, 0.035% taker | On-chain FIFO order book and spline liquidity | 83/100 |
5 | Flash Trade | Broad asset selection and liquidity incentives | Market-specific, from 0.051% per open or close | Multi-pool oracle-priced execution | 77/100 |
6 | Velocity | Maker rebates, bots and cross-collateral | 0.035% taker, falling to 0.020%; 0.0025% maker rebate | JIT auctions, DLOB and AMM | 73/100 |
7 | Adrena | Community incentives and simple pool trading | No opening fee; 0.14% close fee | Peer-to-pool oracle execution | 65/100 |
The Decentralised News score is an editorial comparison, not a scientific rating or guarantee of platform safety. It weights liquidity, execution, fees, markets, trading tools, developer infrastructure, mobile usability and security disclosures.
The Solana Perpetual DEX Ecosystem
Solana is increasingly capable of supporting several competing perpetual exchange designs:
- Fully on-chain central limit order books
- Off-chain matching with on-chain custody or settlement
- Peer-to-pool exchanges
- Oracle-priced liquidity pools
- Just-in-Time liquidity auctions
- Hybrid order book and AMM systems
- Real-world asset perpetual markets
- Automated market-making and keeper networks
The Solana Foundation argues that the network can now support derivatives in which order submission, matching, cancellation, oracle updates and settlement all occur on-chain. It has also acknowledged that much of the wider perpetual market still relies on centralised exchanges or hybrid architectures with off-chain matching engines.
This creates an important distinction. A platform can be built on Solana without every element of its execution system running directly on-chain.
For example:
- Phoenix prioritises fully on-chain execution.
- Jupiter uses on-chain trade requests fulfilled by keeper infrastructure.
- Pacifica uses a high-performance order-book model with Solana-linked accounts.
- GMTrade and Flash Trade use liquidity pools and oracle-based execution.
- Velocity combines on-chain orders with keeper-organised liquidity and JIT auctions.
These architectures should not be treated as interchangeable.
Why Ecosystem Directories Are Not Enough
Solana Compass and Alchemy provide useful discovery lists, but directories can continue to display projects after their products have changed, entered testing or stopped operating. Alchemy says its listings combine submissions, editorial research, public information and third-party directories. Solana Compass also makes clear that it is community-run rather than an official Solana Foundation directory.
For this ranking, a platform had to meet all of the following requirements:
- A working public trading interface
- Current official documentation
- Solana-native execution, custody or settlement
- Verifiable active markets
- No known suspension of normal trading
- Enough fee, liquidity or execution information to make a meaningful comparison
Legacy listings were not accepted as proof that a platform remained operational.
Ranking Methodology
1. Liquidity and Market Activity: 30%
We considered:
- 30-day perpetual volume
- Open interest
- Protocol liquidity or TVL
- Number and quality of active markets
- Pool utilisation
- Likely slippage or price impact for larger trades
TVL is not directly comparable across every exchange model. Jupiter’s TVL represents assets held in its pool and trader collateral, while an order-book exchange may require much less locked capital to support high trading volume. Volume, open interest and executable depth therefore matter alongside TVL.
2. Execution Quality: 25%
The review considers:
- Order-book or pool architecture
- Matching speed
- On-chain versus off-chain components
- Price impact
- Oracle design
- Order acknowledgement and cancellation
- Market, limit and conditional orders
- Cross and isolated margin availability
3. Fees and Holding Costs: 15%
We evaluated:
- Maker fees
- Taker fees
- Opening and closing fees
- Price-impact charges
- Borrowing costs
- Funding
- Liquidation charges
- Token-based discounts and rebates
4. Markets and Collateral: 10%
Higher scores were awarded for:
- Broad crypto market coverage
- Stocks, commodities and forex
- Multi-asset collateral
- Unified margin
- Cross and isolated accounts
5. APIs and Mobile Support: 10%
This includes:
- REST APIs
- WebSockets
- SDKs
- Subaccounts
- Delegated trading keys
- Native mobile applications
- Responsive mobile trading interfaces
6. Security and Decentralisation: 10%
We considered:
- Self-custody
- On-chain execution
- Audit availability
- Upgrade controls
- Oracle dependence
- Liquidation design
- Pool solvency
- Socialised-loss or ADL risks
Current Solana Perpetual Liquidity and Activity
Platform | Tracked TVL or Pool Liquidity | 30-Day Perpetual Volume | Open Interest | Interpretation |
Jupiter Perps | $714.8 million | $4.76 billion | $71.5 million | Deepest pool-based liquidity |
GMTrade | $34.7 million | $18.69 billion | $58.4 million | Highest recent turnover in this ranking |
Pacifica | $27.8 million | $10.88 billion | $102.7 million | Highest tracked open interest |
Phoenix Perps | Not reported as comparable TVL | $79.1 million | $7.1 million | Newer fully on-chain order-book venue |
Flash Trade | Approximately $7.5 million | Varies by pool and reporting window | Not consistently reported | Smaller pool base with broad products |
Adrena | Approximately $431,000 | Limited relative to leaders | Not consistently reported | Smaller community-focused venue |
Velocity | No comparable independent figure found | No comparable independent figure found | No comparable independent figure found | Newer independent deployment |
Figures are dynamic and were captured from DefiLlama during research. The data shows why a single liquidity number can mislead. Jupiter has more than twenty times GMTrade’s TVL, yet GMTrade recorded substantially higher recent notional volume. Pacifica produced less TVL than either but had the highest reported open interest.
1. Pacifica: Best Overall Solana Perpetual DEX for Professional Traders
Pacifica takes first place because it combines high current activity with one of the most complete professional trading stacks on Solana.
At the time of research, DefiLlama recorded approximately $10.88 billion in 30-day perpetual volume and $102.7 million in open interest. That open-interest figure was higher than Jupiter, GMTrade and Phoenix.
Pacifica Fees
30-Day Volume | Maker Fee | Taker Fee |
Below $5 million | 0.015% | 0.040% |
Above $5 million | 0.012% | 0.038% |
Above $10 million | 0.009% | 0.036% |
Above $25 million | 0.006% | 0.034% |
Above $50 million | 0.003% | 0.032% |
Above $100 million | 0% | 0.030% |
Above $250 million | 0% | 0.029% |
Above $500 million | 0% | 0.028% |
Fee tiers update daily using the account’s trailing 30-day volume, with subaccount volume contributing to the master account’s tier.
Execution and Order Types
Pacifica supports:
- Market orders
- Limit orders
- Stop-market orders
- Stop-limit orders
- Good-Til-Cancelled orders
- Immediate-or-Cancel orders
- Post-only orders
- Top-of-Book orders
- Take-profit and stop-loss controls
- Batch orders through the API
The platform applies a deliberate delay to aggressive order flow. Its changelog currently states that market, GTC and IOC orders are subject to roughly 200 milliseconds of taker latency. This is intended to protect liquidity providers, but latency-sensitive strategies must include it in their execution testing.
Markets and Collateral
Pacifica lists more than 35 perpetual markets, with leverage from 3x to 50x depending on the instrument. It supports cross margin, isolated margin, spot collateral, unified margin and a connected USDC money market.
Its oracle price is updated approximately every three seconds using a weighted basket of external markets. The mark price combines the oracle, Pacifica’s own order book and external perpetual prices.
API Quality
Pacifica has one of the most comprehensive developer offerings in this ranking:
- REST API
- WebSocket feeds
- Batch order support
- Best-bid-and-offer streams
- Subaccounts
- Vault-management endpoints
- Spot and collateral management
- Builder codes
- Model Context Protocol tools for AI agents
Its documentation continued receiving substantial updates through June 2026.
Mobile Support
Pacifica provides a polished web interface that can be used through mobile browsers. A dedicated native mobile application was not identified in the official documentation reviewed.
Pacifica Advantages
- High current volume and open interest
- Competitive maker and taker fees
- Broad perpetual market selection
- Cross and isolated margin
- Unified spot collateral
- Professional APIs and WebSockets
- Advanced conditional orders
- Subaccounts and vaults
Pacifica Limitations
- Hybrid rather than fully on-chain order matching
- Added taker latency
- More complex than a pool-based beginner platform
- Unified margin can transmit losses between positions
- Restricted in the United States and several other jurisdictions
Best For
Pacifica is the strongest choice for professional discretionary traders, market makers, developers and systematic strategies.
2. GMTrade: Best for Current Volume, Low Fees and RWA Markets
Referral code: decent
GMTrade ranks second overall and first for current reported trading volume.
At the research date, DefiLlama recorded approximately $18.69 billion in 30-day perpetual volume, $58.4 million in open interest and $34.7 million in TVL. These figures placed GMTrade ahead of the other Solana-native venues in this ranking by recent notional volume.
GMTrade Fees
Market Category | Lower Open or Close Fee | Higher Open or Close Fee |
Forex | 0.004% | 0.006% |
Crypto | 0.010% | 0.012% |
Stocks | 0.010% | 0.012% |
Commodities | 0.010% | 0.012% |
The lower fee applies when a trade improves the balance between long and short exposure. The higher fee applies when it increases the imbalance.
These direct trading fees are exceptionally low. They do not represent the total holding cost.
A GMTrade position may also incur:
- Positive or negative funding
- Utilisation-based borrowing fees
- Price impact
- Solana transaction costs
- Liquidation risk
Funding adjusts according to the imbalance between long and short open interest. Borrowing charges increase as pool utilisation rises.
Execution Model
GMTrade uses isolated liquidity pools combined with cross-pool coordination.
Its markets can be:
- Fully backed by assets in the pool
- Synthetic and backed by alternative pool assets
Trades that improve pool balance can receive more favourable fees and price impact. Trades that make exposure more one-sided may receive higher fees and negative impact.
This is different from a conventional order book. A trader executes against protocol liquidity rather than a visible queue of bids and offers.
Order Types
GMTrade supports:
- Market positions
- Limit orders
- Take-profit orders
- Stop-loss orders
- Collateral adjustments
- Partial position reductions
Its risk system can use auto-deleveraging when synthetic-market profits exceed the backing available to the pool.
Market Selection
GMTrade is one of the strongest Solana platforms for:
- Cryptocurrency perpetuals
- Stocks
- Commodities
- Forex
- Other real-world asset markets
The platform describes itself as an RWA-focused Solana perpetual DEX.
GMTrade Advantages
- Highest current 30-day volume among ranked platforms
- Very low direct opening and closing fees
- Strong RWA market coverage
- Wallet-based Solana access
- Adaptive funding
- Price-impact rebates in qualifying cases
- Multiple isolated liquidity pools
GMTrade Limitations
- Not a conventional central-limit order book
- Borrowing and funding costs can exceed direct fees
- Price impact depends on pool balance
- Synthetic markets can use auto-deleveraging
- API and mobile documentation is less extensive than Pacifica or Phoenix
Best For
GMTrade is best for active traders seeking stocks, forex, commodities and crypto markets with low direct fees.
3. Jupiter Perps: Best for Deep Pool Liquidity, Beginners and Mobile Trading
Jupiter remains the largest Solana perpetual platform by locked pool liquidity.
DefiLlama tracked approximately $714.8 million in TVL, $71.5 million in open interest and $4.76 billion in 30-day perpetual volume during research.
How Jupiter Perps Works
Jupiter uses a trader-to-liquidity-pool model.
Traders borrow assets from the Jupiter Liquidity Provider pool to establish leveraged positions. JLP holders act as the counterparty and receive 75% of the fees generated through perpetual trading, swaps and pool activity.
Trades execute at oracle prices rather than against an order book. This removes conventional order-book slippage, but Jupiter applies a separate price-impact fee to compensate liquidity providers for large or imbalanced positions.
Jupiter Perps Fees
Cost | Current Structure |
Opening fee | 0.06% of position size |
Closing fee | 0.06% of position size |
Price-impact fee | Variable |
Borrow fee | Charged hourly |
Token swap fee | May apply |
Solana network fee | Applies to transactions |
Liquidation penalty | Remaining collateral is forfeited |
A $10,000 position opened and later closed normally produces $12 in base fees before adding price impact, hourly borrowing costs and network fees.
Jupiter is therefore not the cheapest Solana perpetual venue by headline fee.
Execution
Each Jupiter perpetual trade involves:
- An on-chain request from the trader
- Automated fulfilment by a keeper
Price data is drawn from Edge by Chaos Labs, Chainlink and Pyth.
The interface supports:
- Market orders
- Limit orders
- Take-profit orders
- Stop-loss orders
It does not provide the same depth of order-book controls as Pacifica or Phoenix.
Collateral and Liquidity
The JLP pool currently holds SOL, ETH, wrapped Bitcoin, USDC, USDT and JupUSD. JLP performance depends on pool assets, trader profit and loss, and fee revenue.
Mobile Support
Jupiter has the strongest mobile offering in this ranking.
Jupiter Mobile is available on:
- iOS
- Android
- Solana Seeker
- Solana Saga
- Play Solana
The self-custodial application provides direct access to perps, swaps, orders, lending and portfolio management.
Jupiter Advantages
- Largest pool liquidity
- Strongest native mobile experience
- Simple interface
- Oracle-priced execution
- Large existing Solana user base
- Integrated swaps, lending and portfolio tools
- Multiple independent price feeds
- JLP liquidity incentives
Jupiter Limitations
- Higher base trading fees
- Price-impact and borrow fees
- Limited advanced order types
- Pool acts as trader counterparty
- Smaller market catalogue than Pacifica, Phoenix or Flash
- Liquidation forfeits remaining collateral
Best For
Jupiter is the clearest choice for beginners, mobile users and traders who value deep pool liquidity over advanced order-book controls.
4. Phoenix Perps: Best Fully On-Chain Solana Perpetual Order Book
Phoenix is the most compelling choice for traders who prioritise fully on-chain order-book execution.
It is a non-custodial, crankless Solana perpetual exchange. Traders interact with resting limit orders and continuously updated spline liquidity rather than a conventional off-chain matching engine.
Phoenix Fees
Execution | Fee |
Maker | 0.005% |
Taker | 0.035% |
A $10,000 maker fill costs approximately $0.50, while a taker fill costs approximately $3.50. A limit order can execute partly as a taker before its remaining quantity rests as maker liquidity.
Execution and Order Types
Phoenix provides:
- FIFO order-book priority
- Resting limit orders
- Market orders
- Advanced orders
- Reduce-only
- Post-only
- Take-profit and stop-loss
- Cross and isolated accounts
- Self-trade prevention
- Spline liquidity
- Delegated position authority
The live interface displays its order book, funding, mark price, open interest and estimated trading fee.
Markets
Phoenix lists crypto and real-world asset markets.
Official market specifications currently include:
- Bitcoin
- Ethereum
- Solana
- Apple
- Nvidia
- Tesla
- Amazon
- Microsoft
- Gold
- Silver
- Copper
- WTI oil
- Additional equities and cryptocurrencies
Leverage is market-specific. Current documented RWA leverage reaches 25x for selected commodities and 20x for several equity markets.
Liquidity
Phoenix was materially smaller than Pacifica, GMTrade and Jupiter at the research date. DefiLlama recorded approximately $79.1 million in 30-day volume and $7.1 million in open interest.
That does not invalidate its architecture, but large traders should inspect visible depth before entering.
APIs and Professional Tools
Phoenix provides:
- REST APIs
- WebSocket data
- TypeScript SDK
- Command-line interface
- Local paper trading
- TWAP and grid-strategy runners
- Delegated trading authorities
- Builder codes through Flight
A delegated position authority can place and cancel orders but cannot withdraw collateral from the account. This is useful for bots and third-party trading interfaces.
Token Incentives
Phoenix explicitly states that it does not run a points programme or promise a token airdrop. It does operate referral and builder incentives.
Phoenix Advantages
- Fully on-chain and non-custodial
- Transparent FIFO order book
- Competitive maker and taker fees
- Cross and isolated accounts
- Strong developer infrastructure
- Delegated trading keys
- Crypto and RWA markets
- No speculative points campaign
Phoenix Limitations
- Lower current liquidity and open interest
- Newer product with a shorter operating history
- USDC is the primary collateral
- Large orders may face thinner depth
- No native mobile application identified
- Limited current token incentives
Best For
Phoenix is best for developers, professional traders and users who place greater value on verifiable on-chain execution than on maximum liquidity.
5. Flash Trade: Best for Broad Markets, Pool Liquidity and Trader Incentives
Trade on Flash Trade
Flash Trade is a Solana-native, asset-backed spot and perpetual exchange using a multi-pool, peer-to-pool model.
Its current documentation describes standard leverage of up to 100x, with a separate high-risk Degen Mode supporting much higher leverage for selected markets.
Flash Trade Markets
Flash supports a broad selection including:
- Bitcoin
- Ethereum
- Solana
- BNB
- Zcash
- Solana ecosystem tokens
- Meme coins
- Gold and silver
- Forex
- Crude oil
- Tokenised equity-linked markets
Official onboarding documentation lists assets such as Nvidia, MicroStrategy, SPY, Circle and Tesla-linked instruments alongside crypto, forex and metals.
Flash Trade Fees
Market Group | Open or Close Fee |
Major crypto pool | 0.051% |
Forex | 0.08% |
Metals | 0.10% |
Crude oil | 0.15% |
Solana ecosystem assets | 0.11% |
Meme markets | 0.12% |
Positions can also incur utilisation-based margin fees and swap costs.
Execution
Flash uses oracle-derived pricing and multi-asset liquidity pools.
Liquidity providers act as counterparties to traders and receive a portion of:
- Opening and closing fees
- Margin fees
- Swap fees
- Liquidation proceeds
- Liquidity-management fees
- Trader losses
Pool fee shares vary, with many pools directing between 70% and 90% of relevant fees to liquidity providers.
Token Incentives
The FAF token provides:
- Trading-fee discounts
- Higher referral rebates
- Liquidity-yield boosts
- Governance
- Activity rewards
Voltage Points are earned through trading, liquidity provision and referrals.
API and Security
Flash provides a TypeScript SDK for deposits, trading and integrations. Its documentation lists security reviews from Offside Labs and Halborn, together with an economic stress audit covering its margin engine and liquidity pools.
Mobile Support
The web interface is usable through mobile browsers. Flash has documented mobile chart and simulation improvements, but a dedicated native application was not identified.
Flash Trade Advantages
- Broad crypto and RWA market coverage
- Several liquidity pools
- Oracle-priced execution
- TypeScript SDK
- Public security reports
- FAF token benefits
- Liquidity-provider revenue
- Wallet-based Solana access
Flash Trade Limitations
- Higher fees than Pacifica, GMTrade, Phoenix and Velocity
- Utilisation-based margin costs
- Pool-specific complexity
- Very high leverage options
- RWA markets follow traditional market hours
- Liquidity is fragmented across several pools
Best For
Flash is best for traders seeking varied markets, pool-based execution and direct token incentives.
6. Velocity: Best for Low Fees, Maker Rebates and Trading Automation
Referral status: Decentralised News does not currently have a verified Velocity referral link. The link above is neutral.
Velocity is an independent Solana protocol forked from the Drift Protocol v2 codebase. It operates under its own program ID and concentrates on perpetual futures, token swaps, lending and borrowing. It should not be described simply as a renamed Drift deployment.
Velocity Fees
30-Day Volume | Taker Fee | Maker Rebate |
Below $2 million | 0.035% | 0.0025% |
$2 million to $10 million | 0.030% | 0.0025% |
$10 million to $20 million | 0.0275% | 0.0025% |
$20 million to $80 million | 0.025% | 0.0025% |
$80 million to $200 million | 0.0225% | 0.0025% |
At least $200 million | 0.020% | 0.0025% |
The maker rebate remains flat across all tiers. The structure is based on 30-day volume rather than governance-token staking.
Execution
Velocity combines three sources of liquidity:
- Just-in-Time auctions
- An on-chain decentralised limit order system organised by keepers
- A virtual automated market maker
Market orders enter a short auction, currently around five seconds by default, during which market makers can compete to provide execution before the AMM becomes the backstop.
Order Types and APIs
Velocity supports:
- Market orders
- Limit orders
- Trigger orders
- Stop losses
- Take profits
- Post-only orders
- Reduce-only orders
- Immediate-or-Cancel
- Subaccounts
- Delegated accounts
- Keeper bots
- JIT market-making bots
- Liquidation bots
- TypeScript SDK
- Data APIs
- DLOB WebSocket data
Its developer documentation is among the most extensive in this ranking.
Collateral
USDT is the principal quote and settlement asset. Other deposited assets can earn lending yield while contributing risk-adjusted collateral to perpetual positions. For example, SOL collateral receives a reduced weight compared with USDT.
Funding
Velocity applies hourly funding and currently includes a baseline annualised funding offset of approximately 10.95%. The actual payment depends on market divergence, direction and position size. Traders should therefore inspect funding carefully before holding longer-term positions.
Security Limitation
Velocity inherited code previously reviewed through Drift audits, but those audits do not cover every Velocity-specific change or its independent deployment. A post-fork OtterSec audit was still in progress when this article was researched.
Velocity Advantages
- Lowest base taker fee among the order-book-style platforms ranked
- Maker rebate at every tier
- Advanced order types
- Strong SDK and bot documentation
- Cross-collateral lending and trading
- On-chain transparency
- JIT and DLOB liquidity
- Insurance-fund and keeper infrastructure
Velocity Limitations
- Newer independent deployment
- Comparable volume and liquidity figures were not available
- Dedicated post-fork audit not yet published
- Approximately five-second default JIT auction
- Complex cross-margin system
- Socialised-loss and unsettled-profit risks
- Baseline funding offset can increase holding costs
Best For
Velocity is best for technically sophisticated traders, developers, market makers and users seeking maker rebates.
7. Adrena: Best Community-Owned Solana Perpetual DEX
Trade on Adrena
Adrena is a permissionless, open-source peer-to-pool perpetual exchange built on Solana.
It uses a multi-asset liquidity pool, oracle pricing and a two-token system built around ADX governance and ALP liquidity.
Adrena Fees
Action | Fee |
Open a position | 0% |
Add collateral | 0% |
Close a position | 0.14% |
Liquidation | Normal close fee only |
USDC pool mint | 0% |
USDC pool redeem | 0.10% |
Borrow fee | Variable by utilisation |
Adrena’s fee model concentrates the direct trading charge at position closure. Borrowing costs can rise substantially as pool utilisation increases.
Execution
Adrena provides:
- Oracle-priced trades
- No conventional order-book price impact
- Permissionless wallet access
- Up to 100x leverage
- Open-source keeper automation
- Take-profit and stop-loss tools
- Peer-to-pool liquidity
The pool acts as the trader’s counterparty. This provides a simpler experience but creates liquidity-provider exposure to profitable traders.
Token Incentives
ADX holders participate in governance and currently receive a share of protocol revenue. ALP represents liquidity-pool ownership and earns a larger share of trading revenue.
Security
Adrena’s documentation lists V2 reviews from Fidesium and Offside Labs, with V1 audits from OtterSec and Offside Labs.
Liquidity Limitation
DefiLlama tracked only approximately $431,000 in pool TVL at the research date. This is substantially below the liquidity associated with Jupiter, GMTrade, Pacifica and Flash.
Adrena Advantages
- No opening fee
- No additional liquidation penalty
- Permissionless wallet trading
- Direct community token economics
- Audited V1 and V2 deployments
- Open-source keeper infrastructure
- Straightforward pool-based model
Adrena Limitations
- Limited current liquidity
- 0.14% close fee
- Variable borrowing costs
- Smaller market catalogue
- Pool-counterparty risk
- Less comprehensive API infrastructure
- Not suitable for large orders without checking capacity
Best For
Adrena is best for smaller traders who value community ownership and straightforward peer-to-pool execution.
Solana Perpetual DEX Fee Comparison
Platform | Entry Cost | Exit Cost | Other Important Costs |
Pacifica | 0.015% maker or 0.040% taker | Same | Funding and slippage |
GMTrade | 0.004% to 0.012% | 0.004% to 0.012% | Price impact, funding and borrowing |
Jupiter | 0.06% | 0.06% | Price impact and hourly borrowing |
Phoenix | 0.005% maker or 0.035% taker | Same | Funding and order-book slippage |
Flash Trade | 0.051% to 0.15% | Same | Margin and swap fees |
Velocity | Maker rebate or 0.020% to 0.035% taker | Same | Funding, borrow interest and builder fees |
Adrena | 0% | 0.14% | Utilisation-based borrowing |
The fee table does not identify the universally cheapest platform.
For example:
- A market order on GMTrade can have a low direct fee but significant negative price impact.
- A zero-slippage Jupiter trade can incur a price-impact fee and hourly borrow charges.
- A Pacifica or Phoenix order can obtain a low maker rate but fail to fill.
- Velocity can pay a maker rebate but has a baseline funding offset.
- Adrena charges no entry fee but concentrates the charge at exit.
The correct comparison is total round-trip cost.
Execution Models Compared
Platform | Execution Model | Main Strength | Main Trade-Off |
Pacifica | Hybrid central limit order book | Professional execution and APIs | Off-chain matching dependency |
GMTrade | Oracle-priced isolated pools | Low fees and broad markets | Pool imbalance and price impact |
Jupiter | Oracle-priced JLP pool | Deep pool and simple execution | Higher fees and limited orders |
Phoenix | Fully on-chain FIFO order book | Transparency and composability | Smaller current depth |
Flash Trade | Multi-pool oracle model | Broad market and collateral support | Fragmented liquidity |
Velocity | JIT, DLOB and AMM | Flexible maker participation | Complexity and auction delay |
Adrena | Peer-to-pool oracle model | Simple wallet execution | Smaller pool capacity |
Which Solana Perpetual DEX Has the Best Liquidity?
Best Pool Liquidity: Jupiter
Jupiter has by far the largest pool and the clearest capacity for large oracle-priced trades. Its price-impact fee can still make an oversized or unbalanced position expensive.
Highest Recent Turnover: GMTrade
GMTrade led the ranked group by 30-day notional volume during the research snapshot. This suggests strong recent activity, although turnover alone does not guarantee narrow price impact on every market.
Highest Current Open Interest: Pacifica
Pacifica had the highest tracked open interest, indicating substantial outstanding positions and active trader participation.
Best Visible On-Chain Order Book: Phoenix
Phoenix exposes its order-book-based execution directly on Solana. It remains materially smaller than the volume leaders, so depth should be checked on the specific pair.
Which Solana Perpetual DEX Has the Lowest Fees?
Lowest Pool-Trading Fees: GMTrade
GMTrade’s direct opening and closing rates begin at 0.004% for forex and 0.010% for crypto and RWA markets. Funding, borrowing and price impact must still be included.
Best Maker Economics: Velocity
Velocity pays a 0.0025% maker rebate across every volume tier.
Best Order-Book Fees for Regular Traders: Phoenix
Phoenix charges 0.005% for makers and 0.035% for takers without requiring high trading volume.
Best High-Volume CLOB Fees: Pacifica
Pacifica reaches zero maker fees and a 0.028% taker fee for accounts exceeding $500 million in 30-day volume.
Order Types Compared
Feature | Pacifica | GMTrade | Jupiter | Phoenix | Flash | Velocity | Adrena |
Market | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Limit | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Limited model |
Stop market | Yes | Yes | TP/SL | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Stop limit | Yes | Not clearly documented | No | Advanced | Market-specific | Yes | No |
Take profit | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Reduce-only | Yes | Yes | Position close | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Post-only | Yes | No pool equivalent | No | Yes | No pool equivalent | Yes | No pool equivalent |
IOC | Yes | No pool equivalent | No | Yes | No pool equivalent | Yes | No pool equivalent |
Cross margin | Yes | Pool-specific | Position-specific | Yes | Pool-specific | Yes | Pool-based |
Isolated margin | Yes | Market-specific pools | Position-based collateral | Yes | Pool-specific | Isolated pools documented | Pool-based |
Collateral and Margin Comparison
Pacifica
USDC is the principal settlement asset. Eligible spot holdings can contribute towards unified collateral at reduced loan-to-value ratios. Cross and isolated margin are supported.
GMTrade
The available collateral depends on the liquidity pool and market. Users choose the market, pool and supported collateral asset before opening a position.
Jupiter
Liquidity is drawn from the JLP pool containing SOL, ETH, wrapped Bitcoin and several stablecoins. Position profit and loss is settled in the relevant underlying collateral token.
Phoenix
Phoenix currently uses USDC as its primary collateral and supports independent portfolios, cross accounts and isolated subaccounts.
Flash Trade
Collateral and liquidity are separated across multi-asset pools. Different pools support major crypto, Solana assets, meme coins and synthetic markets.
Velocity
USDT is the primary quote asset. SOL and other supported assets can earn lending yield while contributing risk-adjusted margin.
Adrena
The ALP multi-asset pool supplies liquidity and acts as the counterparty to traders.
Token Incentives Compared
Platform | Incentive Structure |
Pacifica | Points, referrals, builder and market-maker programmes |
GMTrade | GT incentives, referrals and VIP discounts |
Jupiter | JLP fee income and JUP ecosystem incentives |
Phoenix | Referrals and builder fees; no points or promised token airdrop |
Flash Trade | FAF staking, fee discounts, yield boosts and Voltage Points |
Velocity | Referral discounts, keeper rewards and insurance-fund staking |
Adrena | ADX governance and revenue share; ALP liquidity revenue |
Incentives should not replace analysis of execution quality. Points may never convert into a valuable token, and token rewards can lose value faster than fee savings accumulate.
Mobile Trading Comparison
Best Native Mobile Experience: Jupiter
Jupiter provides native iOS and Android applications, alongside support for Solana mobile devices.
Best Mobile Web Interfaces
Pacifica, GMTrade, Phoenix and Flash Trade provide browser-based interfaces that can be used from mobile devices.
Most Limited Mobile Experience
Velocity and Adrena remain better suited to desktop wallet workflows and advanced users. Traders should test order management and emergency position closing from their own mobile device before relying on it.
API and Algorithmic-Trading Ranking
Rank | Platform | Why |
1 | Pacifica | REST, WebSocket, batch orders, subaccounts, builder tools and MCP |
2 | Phoenix | SDK, API, CLI, paper trading, delegated keys and strategy runners |
3 | Velocity | Extensive TypeScript SDK, DLOB feeds, keeper and JIT bot guides |
4 | Flash Trade | TypeScript SDK and direct protocol integrations |
5 | GMTrade | Rust SDK and on-chain pool infrastructure |
6 | Jupiter | Strong general Jupiter infrastructure but simpler perp execution controls |
7 | Adrena | Open-source keepers but less comprehensive public trading APIs |
Developers should test real-world acknowledgement latency, WebSocket gaps, cancellation behaviour, rate limits and recovery after disconnection. Documentation quality does not guarantee production reliability.
Security and Decentralisation Comparison
Platform | Main Security Strength | Important Risk |
Pacifica | Wallet authentication and documented risk controls | Hybrid matching and operational infrastructure |
GMTrade | On-chain pools and audited status | Pool solvency, oracle and ADL risk |
Jupiter | Large audited protocol and multiple price feeds | Keeper, oracle and JLP counterparty exposure |
Phoenix | Fully on-chain, non-custodial and crankless | Newer protocol and smaller liquidity base |
Flash Trade | Multiple technical and economic audits | Pool, oracle and high-leverage risk |
Velocity | Open-source on-chain program and inherited audit history | Velocity-specific post-fork audit unfinished |
Adrena | Multiple V1 and V2 audits | Small liquidity pool and peer-to-pool exposure |
No Solana perpetual DEX is risk-free.
Major risks include:
- Smart-contract vulnerabilities
- Oracle errors
- Network congestion
- Keeper or matcher outages
- Pool insolvency
- Auto-deleveraging
- Socialised losses
- Collateral depegs
- Failed liquidations
- API-key compromise
- Governance or upgrade-key abuse
Best Solana Perpetual DEX for Beginners
First Choice: Jupiter Perps
Jupiter has the easiest onboarding, strongest mobile support and simplest execution model.
The trader should still understand:
- Leverage
- Borrow fees
- Price-impact fees
- Liquidation
- Oracle pricing
- JLP counterparty mechanics
Second Choice: GMTrade
GMTrade can offer low direct fees and broad markets, but beginners must understand funding, borrowing and pool price impact.
Platforms Beginners Should Approach Carefully
- Pacifica, because of unified margin and advanced order controls
- Phoenix, because of order-book mechanics
- Velocity, because of cross-collateral, funding and unsettled PnL
- Flash, because of pool complexity and high leverage
- Adrena, because limited liquidity can constrain execution
Best Solana Perpetual DEX for Professional Traders
Best Overall: Pacifica
Pacifica combines volume, open interest, APIs, subaccounts, advanced orders and competitive fees.
Best for Fully On-Chain Strategies: Phoenix
Phoenix is the clearest option for developers who want orders, margin and execution to remain on-chain.
Best for Market Makers: Velocity
Velocity provides maker rebates, JIT auctions, keeper systems and extensive bot documentation.
Best for RWA Trading: GMTrade
GMTrade combines stocks, commodities and forex with substantial recent volume and low direct fees.
Best for Pool-Based Liquidity Strategies: Jupiter and Flash
Both allow liquidity providers to earn from trader activity, but LPs take the opposite side of trader profit and loss.
Platforms Not Included in the Ranking
Drift
Drift was excluded because it is not currently operating as a normal live trading venue. The platform halted operations following a major security incident in April 2026, and the user specifically requested only working platforms.
Velocity is an independent fork of the earlier Drift v2 codebase. It is not the same deployment and should be evaluated separately.
BULK
BULK appears in ecosystem directories and currently maintains an active public website. However, comparable live fee, market and public-mainnet trading data could not be confirmed to the same standard as the ranked venues during this review. It remains a project to monitor rather than a ranked recommendation.
Bumpin and Other Directory Listings
Several names appear in third-party data or directories without sufficiently detailed current official documentation. They were not ranked simply because a directory or TVL page continued to display them.
TurboFlow
TurboFlow was not ranked as a Solana-native platform because current tracked liquidity is primarily associated with another blockchain rather than Solana.
Final Verdict
The Solana perpetual market no longer has one obvious winner.
Pacifica ranks first overall because it provides the best current balance of execution, market activity, fees, margin tools and APIs.
GMTrade ranks first for recent turnover and RWA trading. Its direct fees are exceptionally low, although funding, borrowing and price impact must be monitored.
Jupiter remains the liquidity and mobile leader. It is the best starting point for less experienced users, but its all-in costs can be higher.
Phoenix is the most important fully on-chain order-book contender. It offers transparent fees and strong professional tooling, but liquidity remains smaller.
Flash Trade offers the broadest pool-based market mix and substantial token incentives, although fees vary considerably across asset classes.
Velocity has compelling maker economics and automation infrastructure, but it is a newer independent deployment with limited public liquidity data and an unfinished post-fork audit.
Adrena offers the strongest community-ownership thesis, but its current liquidity makes it more suitable for smaller positions.
The best professional setup may involve more than one venue:
- Pacifica for order-book execution
- GMTrade for RWA markets and low fees
- Jupiter for deep pool liquidity and mobile access
- Phoenix for fully on-chain strategies
- Velocity for maker rebates and bots
Traders should route each position according to the live market rather than committing exclusively to one protocol.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best Solana perpetual DEX?
Pacifica is the best overall choice for professional traders. GMTrade leads for recent trading volume and RWA markets, while Jupiter is best for pool liquidity, mobile access and beginners.
Which Solana perpetual DEX has the most liquidity?
Jupiter has the largest tracked liquidity pool. Its TVL was approximately $714.8 million at the research date.
Which Solana perpetual DEX has the most volume?
GMTrade had the highest tracked 30-day perpetual volume among the live native platforms in this comparison, at approximately $18.69 billion.
Which Solana perpetual DEX has the lowest fees?
GMTrade has the lowest direct pool-trading fees, beginning at 0.004% for forex and 0.010% for crypto and RWA markets. Phoenix has particularly competitive order-book fees, while Velocity offers a maker rebate.
Which platform is best for professional traders?
Pacifica is the strongest all-round professional platform because of its order types, subaccounts, APIs, WebSockets, volume and open interest.
Which platform is best for beginners?
Jupiter Perps has the simplest interface and strongest native mobile support.
Which platform has a fully on-chain order book?
Phoenix provides fully on-chain, non-custodial and crankless perpetual execution on Solana.
Which Solana DEX supports stocks and commodities?
GMTrade, Flash Trade and Phoenix support real-world asset-linked markets. Their market hours, leverage and liquidity differ.
What happened to Drift?
Drift ceased normal operation after a major 2026 security incident and is not included among currently working platforms.
Is Velocity the new name for Drift?
No. Velocity is an independent protocol forked from the Drift v2 codebase and deployed under its own Solana program ID.
Does Decentralised News have a Velocity referral link?
No verified Velocity referral link is currently available. The article uses a neutral platform link.
Does Decentralised News have a GMTrade referral link?
Yes. Use the Decentralised News GMTrade referral link.
The referral code is decent.
Affiliate Disclosure
The GMTrade link in this article is an affiliate or referral link. Decentralised News may receive compensation or platform rewards when eligible readers register or trade through it, at no additional cost to the reader.
Decentralised News does not currently have referral links for Pacifica, Jupiter, Phoenix, Flash Trade, Velocity or Adrena. Affiliate relationships do not determine the ranking, security analysis or conclusions.
Educational Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, tax or trading advice.
Perpetual futures are leveraged products that can result in rapid and total loss. Positions may be liquidated or auto-deleveraged. Funding, borrowing costs, fees, liquidity and market availability can change without notice. Smart contracts, wallets, APIs, oracles, keepers, matching engines and blockchain networks can fail or be exploited.
Verify current fees, markets, audit reports and jurisdictional availability before depositing. Never trade with money you cannot afford to lose. For adults aged 18 and over.