Avantis Review 2027: Is the Universal Leverage Layer the Future of On-Chain Global Markets?
Avantis reviewed for 2027. We analyse its Base architecture, Zero-Fee Perpetuals, 500x leverage, crypto and RWA markets, fees, AVNT tokenomics, buybacks, LP risks, audits and alternatives.
Editorial Classification: Cross-Asset Perpetual DEX / Universal Leverage Infrastructure
Summary
Avantis is attempting something more ambitious than building another perpetual DEX.
Its target market is leverage itself.
The protocol’s stated objective is to become a Universal Leverage Layer, allowing traders to express leveraged views across crypto, currencies, metals, equities, indices and eventually a considerably broader universe of real-world markets. Avantis currently operates on Base and uses synthetic positions backed by USDC liquidity rather than requiring the underlying asset to exist on-chain.
This architecture creates an intriguing possibility.
Instead of separate applications for:
- Bitcoin perpetuals
- Forex
- Gold
- Equity indices
- Individual stocks
- Commodity exposure
one DeFi liquidity engine can theoretically support all of them.
Decentralised News Verdict
Category | Assessment |
Best feature | Cross-asset leveraged trading |
Most innovative product | Zero-Fee Perpetuals |
Blockchain | Base |
Main collateral | USDC |
Highest documented ZFP leverage | Up to 500x on selected majors |
Fixed-fee markets | Crypto, FX, commodities, indices, equities |
ZFP economics | No fixed open/close/borrow fees, variable profit share on winners |
LP structure | Unified avUSDC market-making vault |
Security | v1.5 audits by Zellic and Sherlock |
Oracle dependency | Pyth for relevant pricing |
Native token | AVNT |
Token supply | 1 billion fixed |
Token value capture | Staking, security, incentives, discounts roadmap, buyback-and-burn |
Primary risk | Extreme leverage + peer-to-pool solvency/oracle risk |
DN Rating | 8.7/10 |
Avantis’ strongest achievement is not the 500x leverage headline.
It is building several economic systems that try to make a peer-to-pool perpetual venue behave differently depending on whether a trader improves or worsens protocol risk.
That includes:
loss rebates
positive slippage
dynamic margin fees
and
profit-sharing perpetuals.
Avantis at a Glance
Feature | Avantis |
Network | Base |
Architecture | Fully on-chain synthetic leverage |
Collateral | USDC |
Crypto | Yes |
Forex | Yes |
Metals | Yes |
Commodities | Yes |
Equities | Yes |
Indices | Yes |
Fixed-fee perps | Yes |
Zero-Fee Perps | Yes |
Maximum ZFP leverage | Up to 500x on selected assets |
Limit orders | Fixed-fee product; ZFP availability should be checked live |
Guaranteed SL | Yes, under documented conditions |
Loss rebates | Up to 20% depending on market/skew |
LP product | avUSDC |
Developer SDK | Yes |
Native token | AVNT |
AVNT staking | Yes |
Buyback/burn | Live |
Referral code | 27O0YXU6 |
Avantis’ Foundation says the ecosystem has more than 65,000 users and identifies Pantera Capital, Founders Fund and Coinbase among its backers.
The Bigger Thesis: Why Avantis Matters
Most perpetual DEXs compete inside a narrow arena.
They ask:
Can an on-chain exchange execute BTC and ETH perpetuals as well as a CEX?
Avantis asks something broader:
Can one blockchain leverage engine eventually become infrastructure for trading almost any globally priced asset?
That is a substantially larger addressable problem.
Its roadmap has included crypto, currencies, commodities, indices and equities, while the longer-term vision extends toward more than 100 real-world markets and potentially new event-based leverage products.
If that strategy succeeds, the relevant competitor set eventually becomes larger than Hyperliquid, GMX or other crypto perpetual venues.
It starts overlapping conceptually with:
- CFD brokers
- Retail FX platforms
- Futures brokers
- Crypto derivatives exchanges
- RWA protocols
- Prediction-market infrastructure
That is why Avantis deserves to be analysed as cross-asset infrastructure, not merely another perpetual DEX.
How Avantis Works
Avantis uses a synthetic peer-to-pool architecture.
The trading asset does not necessarily need to exist inside the protocol.
Instead:
- A trader deposits USDC collateral.
- The trader chooses a synthetic market.
- The position references an external price.
- Liquidity providers supply the capital supporting trading.
- PnL settles through the protocol’s USDC architecture.
This makes the design highly capital efficient relative to building individual pools containing every underlying asset.
A USD/JPY trader therefore does not need yen.
A gold trader does not need tokenized bullion.
An equity trader does not need tokenized Apple shares.
The protocol provides price exposure, not ownership of the underlying asset.
That distinction is essential.
Avantis Is Not a Tokenized Asset Exchange
When a trader buys a synthetic gold position on Avantis, the trader does not own gold.
When a trader takes leveraged equity exposure, the trader does not become a shareholder.
This separates Avantis from tokenization platforms.
Product | What the User Owns |
Avantis BTC perp | Synthetic leveraged BTC exposure |
Avantis gold market | Synthetic leveraged gold exposure |
Tokenized Treasury | Claim linked to Treasury instrument structure |
Tokenized stock | Token linked to equity exposure/rights depending on issuer |
Spot BTC | BTC |
Physical gold | Gold |
This distinction becomes increasingly important as RWA terminology spreads throughout DeFi.
Avantis brings RWA prices and leverage on-chain.
It does not necessarily bring the underlying RWA ownership on-chain.
Fixed-Fee Perpetuals vs Zero-Fee Perpetuals
This is the most important distinction in the Avantis product architecture.
Feature | Fixed-Fee Perps | Zero-Fee Perps |
Opening fee | Yes | None |
Fixed closing fee | May apply by market | None |
Borrow/margin fee | Yes | None under current ZFP model |
Winning trade fee | Conventional fees | Share of gross profit |
Losing trade fee | Fees can still apply | No conventional win fee |
Loss protection | Available on eligible markets | No |
Referral discount | Applies under current docs | Not standard ZFP discount |
Maximum leverage | Market dependent | Up to 500x selected majors |
Product maturity | Established | Newer / beta parameters |
This gives Avantis something many competing platforms do not have:
two different ways to pay for leverage.
The Economics of Zero-Fee Perpetuals
The name “Zero-Fee Perpetuals” requires context.
The trader can avoid:
- Fixed opening fees
- Fixed closing fees
- Conventional borrowing costs
under the currently documented ZFP model.
If a trade loses, there can be no conventional trading fee.
If it wins, the protocol takes a portion of gross profit.
Avantis says the profit share can fall as low as 2.5% of gross PnL, with the trader’s retained share increasing at higher ROI levels.
Example
Assume:
Collateral: $1,000
Leverage: 100x
Position: $100,000
Underlying move: +1%
Gross PnL would be approximately:
$1,000
Under a conventional fee model, costs depend on:
- Entry
- Exit
- Spread
- Funding
- Borrowing
Under ZFP, the relevant question becomes:
What percentage of the $1,000 profit is shared with the protocol?
This can make ZFP particularly interesting for:
- Short-term directional traders
- High-leverage traders
- Traders worried about funding decay
- Positions where the probability of losing is meaningful
It can be less attractive if the profit-sharing percentage exceeds what the trader would otherwise have paid in conventional fees.
Interactive Tool: Avantis ZFP vs Fixed-Fee Decision Lab
Is a Zero-Fee Perpetual actually cheaper for your trade?
Avantis gives traders an unusual choice between conventional fixed-fee perpetuals and a Zero-Fee Perpetual model where current ZFP positions avoid fixed opening, closing and borrowing fees but profitable trades share part of their gross P&L with the protocol.
The Decentralised News Avantis ZFP vs Fixed-Fee Decision Lab lets you model both structures using exactly the same position.
Enter your collateral, leverage, expected price movement and holding period, then adjust the live fee assumptions.
The calculator estimates:
ZFP net P&L
Fixed-fee net P&L
Total fee drag
Holding-cost decay
Profit-sharing cost
Loss-rebate impact
Leverage sensitivity
It also calculates the proprietary DN Fee Convexity Threshold, showing approximately where the economics switch between the two fee models.
This is a scenario-analysis tool rather than a live Avantis quote. Always verify the parameters displayed in the trading interface before opening a position
Avantis ZFP vs Fixed-Fee Decision Lab
Compare Avantis Zero-Fee Perpetuals with a conventional fixed-fee position under the same trade. Model profit sharing, trading fees, holding cost, execution impact, keeper cost, loss rebates and leverage sensitivity.
1. Trade Scenario
Use the same position assumptions for both fee models.
2. Fee Assumptions
Editable so the calculator stays useful as protocol parameters change.
Net outcome comparison
Decision signals
Leverage stress
The crossover output estimates the positive underlying move at which ZFP profit sharing becomes equal to the modeled fixed-fee cost stack. Below that point, ZFP may have lower modeled friction; above it, a conventional fixed-fee structure can become cheaper if the profit-share percentage is sufficiently high. This is a scenario comparison, not a universal rule because live spreads, margin fees, profit sharing and eligibility can change.
Trade or compare
Current documentation reference: Avantis documents ZFP as having zero fixed opening, closing and borrowing fees under the current beta model, with profit sharing on winning trades and the same dynamic spreads used by fixed-fee perps. The protocol states that profit sharing can be as low as 2.5% of gross profits depending on ROI. Its current ZFP asset page lists 75x–500x leverage for selected majors and up to 250x for selected meme markets.
Fixed-fee modeling: The BTC preset uses 6 bps opening and 6 bps closing fees and a 10% annualized holding-cost assumption because those figures are used in Avantis' own ZFP-vs-fixed-fee comparison. Actual dynamic margin fees depend on utilization, skew and pair-specific parameters. All values in this calculator can therefore be changed.
Loss rebates: Loss protection is conditional and market/skew dependent. ZFP currently does not include loss-protection rebates. The calculator applies a user-entered fixed-fee rebate only to a negative trading P&L scenario.
Liquidation warning: The 1 ÷ leverage figure is only a simplified sensitivity reference showing the adverse underlying move that would equal the initial collateral before fees and protocol liquidation rules. It is not Avantis' liquidation price and should never be used to manage a live trade.
Affiliate disclosure: The Avantis and comparison-platform links may be referral links. Decentralised News may receive compensation from qualifying activity. Affiliate relationships do not alter the calculation methodology.
Educational use only: Leveraged derivatives can cause rapid or total loss. Smart contracts, oracles, stablecoins, liquidity systems, keepers and blockchain networks can fail. Verify live parameters independently. For adults aged 18 and over.
The 500x Question
Avantis’ current product-specific documentation lists selected ZFP majors including BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP and HYPE in a 75x to 500x leverage range, while selected memes can reach 250x.
Older ZFP documentation still refers to lower maximums, and Avantis explicitly labels ZFP parameters as subject to change during beta.
What 500x Actually Means
At 500x:
A 0.2% movement against a position equals roughly 100% of initial collateral before accounting for the precise liquidation methodology, execution and other protocol parameters.
That is why the correct way to interpret 500x is not:
“Avantis lets me make 500 times more.”
It is:
“Avantis allows me to create an extraordinarily narrow margin for error.”
Extreme leverage is a product capability.
It is not a risk-management recommendation.
Test the leverage rather than just looking at the headline number. Use the Avantis Decision Lab above to change leverage from 10x to 75x, 100x, 250x and 500x and observe how the same underlying market move changes gross P&L, fee drag and collateral sensitivity.
Fixed-Fee Crypto Costs
Avantis’ crypto fixed-fee structure includes several potential components:
Cost | Mechanism |
Opening fee | Charged on notional |
Closing fee | Charged according to market rules |
Dynamic spread | Responds to size and skew |
Margin fee | Changes with utilisation and skew |
Keeper fee | Covers on-chain execution costs |
Liquidation cost | Relevant if position is liquidated |
Its documentation also describes zero-slippage treatment on BTC under particular synthetic-vAMM rules.
Because some figures in the documentation have been revised over time, the live terminal should be treated as the final quote for any specific trade.
Forex Fees
Forex provides one of Avantis’ more compelling RWA use cases.
The documentation currently describes:
Forex Cost | Current Documented Structure |
Opening fee | Roughly 1 to 5 bps depending on skew |
Closing fee | Zero |
EUR/USD spread | Zero documented fixed spread |
USD/JPY spread | Zero documented fixed spread |
GBP/USD spread | Zero documented fixed spread |
Other pairs | Approximately 1 bp documented spread |
Holding cost | Dynamic margin fee |
The result can look competitive against conventional retail CFD structures.
But the comparison must include:
- Margin cost
- Oracle execution
- blockchain risk
- USDC collateral risk
- spread
- leverage
- tax treatment
rather than comparing one advertised spread.
Equity Trading
Avantis has also expanded into synthetic US equity exposure.
Its equity documentation refers to markets including MAG7 equities and Coinbase, with leverage up to 25x.
Current documented equity economics include opening costs, spread and dynamic borrowing/margin economics.
Unlike owning a stock, a synthetic equity perpetual generally does not provide the shareholder rights associated with the underlying equity.
It is a trading instrument.
The DN Avantis Innovation Score
We score the protocol across the characteristics that make it genuinely distinctive.
Category | Score | Why |
Cross-asset breadth | 9.5/10 | Crypto + FX + metals + equities + indices |
Fee innovation | 10/10 | ZFP fundamentally changes fee timing |
On-chain accessibility | 9/10 | Base + wallet/social onboarding |
Trader risk tools | 9/10 | Guaranteed SLs, skew incentives |
Liquidity architecture | 8.5/10 | Unified USDC vault + buffer |
Security disclosure | 8.5/10 | Multiple v1.5 audits + economic-risk work |
Token utility | 8.5/10 | Security module, incentives, buybacks |
Transparency of parameters | 7.5/10 | Documentation versions can conflict as products evolve |
Leverage discipline | 5.5/10 | 500x dramatically increases user risk |
Overall | 8.7/10 | Highly differentiated, but complexity creates risk |
This is an editorial framework, not a safety certification.
Loss Rebates: Paying Traders to Reduce Risk
Loss Rebates are among Avantis’ cleverest economic mechanisms.
A peer-to-pool protocol becomes vulnerable when trader positioning is extremely one-sided.
Suppose:
90% of open interest is long.
A new short improves balance.
Avantis can therefore provide a rebate on an eligible losing short position, effectively compensating the trader for helping reduce protocol skew.
Current rebates can reach as much as 20% of losses, depending on asset and skew conditions.
This turns risk management into a price signal.
Rather than merely limiting positions, the protocol tries to pay the market to rebalance itself.
Positive Slippage
The same philosophy applies to execution.
Avantis says traders helping rebalance open interest can receive positive slippage and enter at a better effective price.
Together:
loss rebates + positive slippage + dynamic fees
create what might be called an economic risk-routing system.
The protocol changes trader incentives based on what its liquidity architecture needs.
That is more sophisticated than simply raising maximum open interest and hoping liquidity holds.
Guaranteed Stop Losses
Avantis documents guaranteed stop losses for qualifying loss-side SL orders.
Because the protocol uses oracle-based execution, it states that the stop can be honoured at the specified price even when the oracle passes through it before keeper execution.
At high ZFP leverage, minimum SL requirements can apply.
This is particularly important because liquidation distances become extremely narrow as leverage increases.
Oracle Risk Is Not Theoretical
Avantis follows Pyth market hours for traditional markets.
One particularly useful piece of evidence is the protocol’s decision to delist WTI/USD on 28 February 2026 because of insufficient oracle reliability.
That reveals something important about RWA perpetuals.
The bottleneck is not simply:
Can a protocol create a synthetic market?
It is:
Can it obtain a sufficiently reliable and continuously usable price?
As Avantis adds long-tail metals, equities and other real-world markets, oracle infrastructure will become increasingly important.
avUSDC: The Capital Behind Avantis
The current liquidity architecture centres on the unified avUSDC vault.
Attribute | avUSDC |
Underlying | USDC |
Token standard | ERC-4626 |
Role | Market-making liquidity |
Trading fees | Flow to LPs under current structure |
Trader losses | Build protocol buffer |
Trader wins | Paid first from buffer, then liquidity if necessary |
Main risks | Trader PnL, smart contracts, liquidity, USDC |
This matters because “yield” in avUSDC is not equivalent to interest in a bank account.
Liquidity providers are part of the economic machinery supporting leveraged trading.
The Vault Buffer
Avantis monitors a Vault Buffer Ratio designed to measure resilience against trader profits.
Its current withdrawal-fee schedule becomes more restrictive when the buffer falls below healthy levels. Documented withdrawal fees range from zero in healthier states to 2.5% at the lowest specified buffer band.
This is an intelligent risk-control mechanism.
It is also evidence that liquidity can become more expensive to exit precisely when the system is under greater pressure.
LPs should understand both sides.
AVNT Tokenomics
AVNT has a fixed supply of 1 billion tokens on Base.
Allocation | Share |
Airdrop 1 | 12.5% |
On-chain incentives | 28.6% |
Builder / ecosystem grants | 9.0% |
Team & advisers | 13.3% |
Investors | 26.6% |
Foundation | 2.0% |
Liquidity reserve | 8.0% |
The distribution dedicates substantial supply to users and ecosystem incentives, but investors should also examine the 26.6% investor allocation and 13.3% team/adviser allocation when evaluating future circulating supply.
AVNT Utility
AVNT has several distinct roles.
Security
AVNT can be staked into the Security Module.
Rewards
Stakers can receive token rewards.
XP
Staking can increase XP multipliers.
Trading
Fee discounts for AVNT stakers are part of the evolving utility roadmap.
Governance
The Foundation intends AVNT to support protocol governance.
Value Capture
Protocol revenue now funds AVNT buybacks and burns.
This represents a more developed token model than a governance token with no economic link to the underlying exchange.
Security Module and Slashing
The Security Module makes AVNT staking economically meaningful because stakers accept downside risk.
Avantis describes activation during major liquidity shortfalls, with a maximum potential slashing amount of 20% of staked AVNT under the current documented framework.
That creates a genuine trade-off:
yield and benefits in exchange for becoming part of the protocol’s safety layer.
Staking APR should therefore never be analysed without the slashing mechanism.
AVNT Buyback and Burn
The Avantis Foundation currently operates systematic AVNT buybacks.
Its dashboard states:
Milestone 1: 30% of daily trading fees allocated to AVNT buyback and burn.
Milestone 2: more than 50% of trading fees targeted for future allocation.
The dashboard recently showed more than 3.6 million AVNT bought back and burned across hundreds of transactions.
This creates a measurable connection between protocol usage and token supply reduction.
It does not guarantee positive investment returns.
Security and Audits
The current Avantis security page documents independent v1.5 reviews from:
Zellic
and
Sherlock
It also identifies Chaos Labs as an economic-risk partner involved in trading-parameter work.
DN Security Assessment
Risk Layer | Assessment |
Third-party audits | Strong |
Economic risk work | Strong |
Oracle dependency | Material |
USDC dependency | Material |
Smart-contract risk | Remains |
LP counterparty economics | Material |
Extreme leverage | High trader risk |
ZFP maturity | Evolving |
Base dependency | Present |
An audited protocol can still fail economically.
A well-designed liquidation system can still suffer during an extreme market gap.
And a reliable oracle can still experience periods where a particular asset cannot be safely supported.
Open Interest Limits
Avantis’ risk-management documentation sets theoretical maximum open interest relative to protocol liquidity and allocates capacity across asset classes. One documented framework caps theoretical Max OI at 90% of total market-making vault TVL before distributing capacity between markets.
This is important.
Leverage alone does not determine protocol risk.
The key variables are:
leverage × open interest × skew × liquidity × market volatility.
A protocol can offer extreme leverage safely only if position sizes and total exposure remain appropriately constrained.
Avantis vs Other On-Chain Trading Models
Platform Type | Primary Model | Key Advantage | Main Trade-Off |
Avantis | Synthetic peer-to-pool | Cross-asset flexibility | LP/oracle dependence |
Orderbook DEX | CLOB-style | Price discovery and trader-to-trader liquidity | Requires deep orderbook |
AMM perp | Pool-based | Fully on-chain liquidity | Price impact / LP exposure |
CFD broker | Broker-dealer model | Very broad RWA coverage | Custody and counterparty dependence |
CEX futures | Centralised orderbook | Deep liquidity | Custodial risk |
Avantis sits somewhere between DeFi perpetual infrastructure and an on-chain CFD-style global-market terminal.
The crucial difference is that the execution, collateral and liquidity architecture is built around blockchain-native systems.
Best Avantis Alternatives
For RWA Perpetuals: Ostium
Code: 1RCGN
Ostium is one of the most direct comparisons for traders interested in forex, commodities, indices and equity-linked on-chain markets.
For Synthetic Multi-Asset Trading: gTrade
Code: decentralised
gTrade offers a mature synthetic leverage model and broad forex/crypto coverage.
For Orderbook Infrastructure: GRVT
Useful for traders preferring a different execution architecture from Avantis’ peer-to-pool model.
For Established Peer-to-Pool Perps: GMX
Code: decentralised
A useful architecture comparison for pool-backed perpetual trading.
For Crypto Orderbooks: Lighter
Better suited to traders primarily interested in crypto orderbook perpetuals rather than Avantis’ RWA breadth.
For Centralised Futures: Bybit
Code: 46164
Relevant where centralised liquidity and conventional futures infrastructure matter more than self-custody.
For Centralised Futures and Copy Trading: Bitget
Code: nqef
Another large centralised alternative with a materially different custody model.
Who Should Use Avantis?
Strong Fit
Macro-oriented crypto traders
The ability to combine Bitcoin, gold, currencies and equities inside one environment is compelling.
On-chain forex traders
Forex is one of Avantis’ more differentiated product categories.
High-leverage specialists
ZFP offers unusually high leverage and a different fee model.
Contrarian traders
Loss rebates and positive slippage can reward positions that reduce skew.
Developers
The Avantis SDK supports building automated trading strategies and applications. Its documentation specifically references bots and RWA-focused AI agents among use cases.
Weaker Fit
Low-risk investors
This is leveraged derivatives infrastructure.
Spot investors
Synthetic exposure does not provide ownership of the underlying asset.
Users uncomfortable with USDC
USDC is central to the system.
Traders who do not understand liquidation
The combination of synthetic exposure and extreme leverage requires active risk management.
The 2027 Opportunity
The most interesting Avantis thesis is not whether traders prefer one fee schedule over another.
It is whether global leverage becomes a composable on-chain primitive.
Imagine an environment where the same liquidity engine can support:
- Bitcoin
- Gold
- EUR/USD
- Nvidia
- Copper
- Equity indices
- Interest-rate products
- Prediction markets
- Tokenized assets
and those positions can then interact with:
- Lending protocols
- Stablecoins
- AI agents
- Portfolio managers
- Automated strategies
- Structured products
That is considerably larger than the market for another crypto derivatives interface.
Avantis’ roadmap explicitly points toward broader RWA coverage, improved capital efficiency and continuing product expansion.
Execution will determine whether that vision becomes infrastructure or remains an ambitious product roadmap.
Decentralised News Final Verdict
Avantis is one of the more original perpetual DEX architectures currently operating on Base.
It deserves attention for four reasons.
1. The market universe is broader than crypto.
Forex, metals, equities and indices turn the protocol into a global-market trading environment.
2. Zero-Fee Perpetuals change the fee equation.
Moving cost from guaranteed transaction fees toward contingent profit sharing is a genuinely different economic design.
3. Trader incentives are linked to protocol risk.
Loss rebates and positive slippage reward trades that help rebalance the system.
4. AVNT has developing economic utility.
Staking, protocol security and systematic buybacks give the token a stronger relationship with platform activity than a simple points token.
The weaknesses are equally real.
500x leverage is inherently unforgiving.
Peer-to-pool liquidity makes LP health important.
USDC and Pyth become infrastructure dependencies.
ZFP parameters are still evolving.
RWA markets introduce market-hour and oracle constraints absent from ordinary crypto.
None of those issues makes Avantis fundamentally unattractive.
They make it a protocol that should be understood before it is used.
DN Rating: 8.7/10
Best for: On-chain global macro and cross-asset traders.
Most innovative feature: Zero-Fee Perpetuals.
Most underrated feature: Loss rebates and positive slippage.
Biggest risk: The combination of extreme leverage and evolving product parameters.
Biggest long-term opportunity: Becoming a genuine universal leverage layer rather than remaining a Base perpetual DEX.
Trade on Avantis
Open Avantis with the Decentralised News referral
Referral code: 27O0YXU6
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Avantis safe?
Avantis has undergone independent security reviews, including documented Zellic and Sherlock audits for v1.5, but audits cannot eliminate smart-contract, oracle, stablecoin, liquidity or market risk.
Is Avantis decentralised?
Avantis describes the exchange as fully on-chain. Users can connect EVM wallets, although its onboarding stack also provides social-login wallet options.
What chain is Avantis on?
Base.
What collateral does Avantis use?
USDC.
Does Avantis have 500x leverage?
Selected Zero-Fee Perpetual markets currently document leverage up to 500x. Product parameters can change.
Does Avantis really have zero fees?
Zero-Fee Perpetuals eliminate conventional fixed open, close and borrowing fees under the current structure, but winning trades can pay a percentage of gross profits.
Does Avantis offer real-world assets?
Avantis offers synthetic leveraged exposure to markets such as forex, metals, indices and selected equities. This is not the same as owning the underlying asset.
What is AVNT?
AVNT is Avantis’ native Base-based utility and governance token with a fixed 1 billion supply.
Does Avantis buy back AVNT?
Yes. The Foundation currently states that 30% of daily trading fees are allocated to AVNT buybacks and burns under the first live milestone.
Can AVNT staking be slashed?
Yes. The Security Module documentation describes potential slashing during specified protocol shortfall events, currently capped at 20% of the staked position.
What is the Avantis referral code?
27O0YXU6
Methodology
Decentralised News evaluates trading venues independently of commercial relationships.
For this review we assessed:
- Architecture
- Market breadth
- Trading costs
- Leverage
- Execution mechanics
- Liquidation
- Oracle dependence
- Liquidity structure
- Security
- Token design
- LP economics
- Developer infrastructure
- Transparency
- Product maturity
Features and parameters can change rapidly. The live Avantis interface and current documentation should always supersede historical figures.
Affiliate Disclosure
This article contains affiliate links, including the Decentralised News Avantis referral.
Decentralised News may receive compensation from qualifying activity. Commercial relationships do not determine ratings, risk classifications or editorial conclusions.
Educational Disclaimer
This article is for informational and educational purposes only and is not financial, investment, legal or tax advice.
Leveraged derivatives can cause rapid or total loss. At extreme leverage, very small market movements can liquidate a position. Smart contracts, stablecoins, blockchain networks, keepers, liquidity vaults and oracle systems can also fail.
Only trade with capital you can afford to lose. Verify current platform terms and market availability independently. For adults aged 18 and over.
About the Author
